Capital Budgeting Decisions With Uncertain Cash Flows
Capital Budgeting Decisions With Uncertain Cash Flows:Learning Objectives:
The analysis in this chapter (capital budgeting decisions) has assumed that all of the future cash flows are known with certainty. However, future cash flows are often uncertain or difficult to estimate. A number of techniques are available for handling this complication. Some of these techniques are quite technical involving computer simulations or advanced mathematical skills and are beyond the scope of this website. However, we can provide some very useful information to managers without getting too technical. An Example:As an example of difficult to estimate future cash flows, consider the case of investments in automated equipment. The up front costs of automated equipment and the tangible benefits, such as reductions in operating costs and lower wastages, tend to be relatively easy to estimate. However, the tangible benefits, such as greater reliability, greater speed, and higher quality, are more difficult to quantify in terms of future cash flows. These intangible benefits certainly impact future cash flows – particularly in terms of increased sales and perhaps higher selling prices – but the cash flow effects are difficult to estimate. What can be done? A fairly simple procedure can be followed when the intangible benefits are likely to be significant. Suppose, for example, that a company with a 12% discount rate considering purchasing automated equipment that would have a 10-years useful life. Also suppose that a discounted cash flow analysis of just the tangible costs and benefits shows a negative net present value of $226,000. Clearly, if the tangible benefits are large enough, they could turn this negative net present value into a positive net present value. In this case, the amount of additional cash flow per year from the intangible benefits that would be needed to make the project financially attractive can be computed as follows:
Thus, if the intangible benefits of the automated equipment are worth at least $40,000 a year to the company, than the automated equipment should be purchased. If in the judgment of management, these intangible benefits are not worth $40,000 a year, then the automated equipment should not be purchased. This technique can be used in other situations in which future cash flows are uncertain or difficult to estimate. For example, this technique can be used when the salvage value is difficult to estimate. To illustrate, suppose that all of the cash flows from an investment in a supertanker have been estimated – other than its salvage value in 20 years. Using a discount rate of 12%, management has determined that the net present value of all of these cash flows is a negative $1.04 million. This negative net present value would be offset by the salvage value of the supertanker. How large would the salvage value have to be to make this investment attractive?
Thus, if the salvage value of the tanker is at least $10 million, its net present value would be positive and the investment would be made. However, if management believes the salvage value is unlikely to be as large as $10 million, the investment should not be made.
|
|||||||||||||||||
You may also be interested in other articles from “capital budgeting decisions” chapter:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other Related Accounting Articles:
- Typical Capital Budgeting Decisions
- Definition and Explanation of Capital Budgeting
- Time Value of Money
- Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Method in Capital Budgeting Decisions
- Postaudit of Investment Projects
- Ranking Investment Projects – The Preference Decisions
- Payback Period Method for Capital Budgeting Decisions
- Capital Investment Appraisal Technique
- Capital Expenditure
- The Use of Venture Capital Funding for Business Expansion
Or
Download E accounting book in MS-word format for just 20 $ - Click here to Download
